Thursday, July 30, 2009


As far as I can learn, Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Gandhi, Abraham Lincoln, Frederick Douglass, Nelson Mandela, and a host of other world-changing activists and leaders never had to take their clothes off in the service of their cause. They would have laughed at the idea. Is it because they were concerned about human rights? Is there something peculiar to animal rights that has inspired at least one organization to continually strip clothes off of its (overwhelmingly female) activists?

Often it is said, animal activists are the voice of the voiceless. This claim, so hugely anthropocentric (as though the only voices that we can hear speak words), creates an anxiety about what is our responsibility to these beings whom we are tacitly acknowledging are different from us because they can’t be speak. It creates an urgency: we must do what we can, we must do it now. But then the interesting thing that happens is that, rather than giving voices to its activists, it takes away their voices by emphasizing their bodies, their naked bodies.

The latest to be added to the long list of naked or nearly-naked activists is Lydia Guevara, Che Guevara’s granddaughter. As far I can tell, Che Guevera never stripped for his cause; and the only time he is shown nude is after his death.

This is not the picture being used in the animal campaign. I asked my son to add a t-shirt. The question I want to pose is what is the meaning of the t-shirt? Is anything gained by asking Lydia Guevara to take it off? Why does any animal activist think a t-shirt removed is more effective to raise the issue of animal exploitation?

I would argue that the t-shirt is to this picture what stripping women is to PETA. It is their “tell.” According to Wikipedia, “A tell in poker is a subtle but detectable change in a player's behavior or demeanor that gives clues to that player's assessment of his hand.” Clearly, PETA feels that if they were to let Lydia Guevara keep her t-shirt they would be giving away something they don’t want to. They need her unclothed; that is the message they have to convey. PETA can’t keep t-shirts on women because it gives away something, something of their power, or the power they have created to captivate the media. Put the t-shirt on, and perhaps no one will pay attention.

Many people respond to say, “well I don’t agree with this part of their work, but PETA does many other good things.” But that is the aspect of the ‘tell” that is so important. Wikipedia continue s “A player's tell gives information only about that player's assessment of his own cards, and hence is reliable only when that player has accurately assessed his own hand.” Has PETA accurately assessed its own situation? Is it really willing to risk its good works by these calculated uses of airbrushed, youthful, correctly proportioned women? By proliferating them, PETA implies that it needs these naked campaigns. This makes PETA more powerless than they need to be, and subject to the male (adolescent?) gaze in constructing its campaign. Why does PETA fear to clothe its women? Why can’t PETA let women have voices along with their clothes?

People say, “Sex sells.” I say, “Sex sells sex.” PETA conflates sexualization and animal exploitation and this harms animals. (That it also harms women is a given, argued not only by me [in Pornography of Meat] but on countless blogs as well.)

I don’t believe animal advocacy needs naked bodies to make its point. Animals can be compelling on their own, if we were to give them a chance and a real voice.

9 comments:

  1. I have never heard it expressed better! Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Carol, excellent post. I am appalled by PETA which is basically just a branch of the global porn industry and I campaign against their disgusting misogyny with the animal advocacy movement.

    ReplyDelete
  3. meant to say 'within the animal advocacy movement'

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks again for your well articulated feminist stance on the objectification of women's bodies for "progressive" causes. It's also interesting that PETA is all about women using their bodies to make a "point," unless that body is fat. Fat women, apparently, should cover their bodies until they lose enough weight to mimic the rigid, enforced female beauty standard. Once again, we see how sizeism and sexism, work hand in hand, like all oppressions. Thanks for your tireless vision of a just, humane world!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I just want to tell you about the one time I took my clothes off as a protest. It was at a festival called the Big Green Gathering, in the summer of 1996. The police were said to be exceeding their powers in strip searching people looking for drugs.

    The point of going naked was partly because it was about strip searching and partly to show we had nothing to hide. Some of the demonstrators took off their clothes (including me). Others did not.

    Someone who (if I remember rightly) was claiming to be the Chief Constable of Wiltshire [a county in the south of England) tried to explain the situation. He said that the police had done a deal with the festival organisers. Normally, he said, the police would not be allowed to strip search anyone without "reasonable cause" to suspect they had drugs with them.

    I remember being stark naked and shouting at this police officer that we had NOT waived our rights by buying tickets to the festival. One of the festival organisers was so annoyed that he was joining in the demo, stark naked. A piccture of him stark naked later appeared in a magazine called "Red Pepper".

    Would I take my clothes off again as a protest? I think so, but only if it felt right. Would I take my clothes off if only the women were asked to strip and the men were not? Absolutely not! Would I appear naked or even topless if I were an actress? I don't think I would.

    For the record, I don't much like PeTA, but I'm not that bothered about the nude celebrities. And I do think that saying, "I'd rather go naked than wear fur" is a bit negative, like saying, "I'd rather starve than eat steak". I'd rather say, "Why would I want to eat steak when I have so many lovely vegan things to eat".

    ReplyDelete
  6. Lazer epilasyon cool girl. hariha görunuyrsun bebek olmadı

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thuốc điều trị xương khớp cho mọi lứa tuổi, thích hợp với những người già đang bị loãng xương, có thể dùng thêm thuốc hỗ trợ tim mạch bổ trợ thêm, làm tăng tuổi thọ, sức khỏe.
    Bạn đang tự ti về vòng 1 khiêm tốn của mình ? Đừng lo hiện nay đã có rất nhiều sản phẩm thuốc nở ngực an toàn đem lại hiệu quả tốt nhất cho các bạn
    Bạn có thể xem them qua những sản phẩm: thuốc chữa trị sỏi thận
    thuoc chong ung thu cua my
    thuốc chống lão hóa
    kẹo ngậm cai thuốc lá
    kem điều trị rạn da

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bài viết rất là hay, đọc rất thú vị, cám ơn bạn đã chia sẽ, cố gắng làm them vài blog hay nữa để mình vào xem nha. Hãy ghé thăm thẩm mỹ viện của mình 
    _____________________________________________
    Nơi cung cấp dịch vụ trị rạn da sau khi sinh:
    Tư vấn và CSKH(24/7): 01686881868
    Website: http://thammyvienavida.com/
    Địa chỉ : 106 Trần Hưng Đạo, Q.1, Tp. Hồ Chí Minh
    Điện Thoại: 08.38373977-38378865- 38378864
    Xem chi tiêt : trị rạn da sau khi sinh
    hoặc tri ran da sau khi sinh

    ReplyDelete